Presidential candidate Rick Santorum and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal stumped in Iowa to defeat Justice David Wiggins, one of the other four members of the court who had signed on to the same-sex marriage decision…. Iowans voted to retain Justice Wiggins by 8 points, and voters in other states rejected partisan challenges to their high court justices.
If the constitution says 'marriage is this,' then people whose marriages are not consistent with the constitution I'd love to think that there was another way of doing it. This is the future.
In my opinion, it would be suicidal if it did. And if you look at places that in fact have gone through and changes their definition of marriage, what you have seen is lower birth rates. What you have seen is lower marriage rates. What you have seen is problems that come from that. So, the biggest issue is that we need to encourage men and women to come together and form stable families and have children so society can continue because if that doesn't happen, it won't.
What I think is important is marriage and the family. And I think the most important thing we can do as a party is to restore the importance of marriage, encouraging marriage from an economic point of view as well as a societal point of view. Known as the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, the bill would have prevented employers from firing, hiring, demoting or promoting workers based on sexual orientation. They have the right to be able to — employment. Privileges of marriage, privileges of government benefits is a different thing than basic right to live their lives as they well should and can as free Americans.
Instead, Mike Pence wants the law to be amended. How can, all of a sudden, we get to a point where if you have a religious point of view on a particular moral issue, you need to be sensitized or re-educated? The only sensitivity training we need is to respect every person. Senator Rick Santorum R-Pa. None of those other freedoms mean anything unless you have the freedom to say, print and gather in the name of what you believe.
- where can i find latch belts for children car seats.
- Catholic church is homophobic and mistreats LGBTQ folks.
- control ready remote run vehicle;
- Mainline Protestants and Same-Sex Marriage!
Mike Pence last week—Sen. Santorum returned to his Voltairian ideology, and more than once wondered out loud why the Indiana law was causing such uproar. Has repeatedly said sexual orientation is a choice, the same argument used by conversion therapy arguments to promote the dangerous practice. I have a problem with homosexual acts. As I would with acts of other, what I would consider to be, acts outside of traditional heterosexual relationships.
And that includes a variety of different acts, not just homosexual. And I have no problem with someone who has other orientations. The question is, do you act upon those orientations?
- Choose your subscription?
- a elmhorst felony charge in illinois;
- the florida inmate medical advocate inc.
And you have to separate the person from their actions. Behavior is a choice. But the point that Gov. Perry was making, which is that any type of behavior action is a choice, is an accurate depiction. According to their website, Sen. Rick Santorum was a confirmed speaker for the Values Voter Summit. A: No research has ever proven that a homosexual orientation is determined at birth….
Q: Can someone's sexual orientation change over time? A: Yes -- and such changes are especially common among young people…. A: Research, clinical experience, and personal testimonies all give evidence that SOCE can help people to change. The evidence does not support such bans, and they therefore represent an assault upon both truth and freedom. However, there is abundant anecdotal evidence that such therapies work—that is, people who say that they were helped by such therapies to change from predominantly homosexual to predominantly heterosexual.
There is also scientific evidence. Significant Findings on Rhetoric and Intolerance. Said LGBT people abroad should not have their lives threatened because of their sexual orientation. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. I stood up and I continue to stand up.
Again, it goes back to this moral relativism, which is very accepting of a variety of different lifestyles. If you say, there is no deviant as long as it's private, as long as it's consensual, then don't be surprised what you get. You're going to get a lot of things that you're sending signals that as long as you do it privately and consensually, we don't really care what you do. And that leads to a culture that is not one that is nurturing and necessarily healthy. Which is more injurious to the children in the school, a teacher in a gay marriage or a teacher who is a pedophile?
It is obvious to any thinking person that the pedophile is a much bigger problem. Here is what the Catechism teaches about this subject:. The offense is compounded by the scandalous harm done to the physical and moral integrity of the young, who will remain scarred by it all their lives; and the violation of responsibility for their upbringing. I am not sure which I find more appalling…the actual arguments made by the professor defending this discriminatory practice, the fact that he sits on the committees that he does with his bias, or that fact that he is teaching our next generation of educators!
- south carolina white pages phone book.
- Scandal’s Shame, Massachusetts’ Pride;
- free background and criminal check;
- Mass. Officials Cheer Gay Marriage Ruling | WBUR News.
What in my remarks would make you think I would object to either of these institutions? While both are historically black universities, they are open to all people, regardless of race, creed, sex or sexual orientation. Please have a seat. Do you find it appalling that we have freedom of religion in this country? The students that attend these schools do so voluntarily. You attempt to define discrimination as a vice.
US Supreme Court backs Colorado baker's gay wedding cake snub - BBC News
What you discriminate against determines its virtue or vice. To discriminate against hiring bank robbers in a bank is discrimination, and discriminating. I do believe in freedom of religion, but I do NOT support using religion to harm others.
I have no problem with people disagreeing with me…as long as they can engage in an intelligent debate. And your argument on discrimination based on a bank robber working in a bank does NOT fall in that category! So, you will define whether a religion harms others?
Teachers are expected to promote the values of the school. If they willfully choose not to, then they cannot expect to receive employment in that context. Are you kidding me? In I think that where children go to school is none of your business, unless, of course, they are your own children. Your claim about percentages is laughable, and of course, pulled out of thin air. And, even if you were right, we are left with the question, why is this appalling, or even newsworthy? First, our legal system should not protect systems for perpetuating prejudice and bigotry. Young people — and especially gay youth — should not be abandoned to psychologically damaging homophobia.
It is more important to nurture a well-developed sense of sexual maturity in individuals — whether gay or straight — than to cater to backward hierarchies. Second, it is deeply ironic for religious institutions to employ unmarried gay people but to fire them when they get married. It makes no sense for organizations which putatively support stable and faithful relationships to punish employees who take an important step in that direction.
Rick Santorum: Compares same-sex marriage to 9/11
Third, religions really need to think seriously about what they think their message is really about. If we must acknowledge the legal right of private organizations to be as prejudiced as they want, I sure hope that people will go elsewhere to find how powerful real love, peace, grace, truth, and reconciliation can be. The fact that one has a same-sex attraction is not immoral in and of itself. Acting upon that attraction, however, can be.
Yes, schools do need to be focused around a philosophy and mission — but is it really okay for that philosophy to involve bigotry and hatred? Moreover, religious schools are schools first and religious institutions second. I do not think it is okay that they can discriminate against employees who are not heterosexuals. I would certainly hope not. Most people find a lifetime of celibacy to be a very unpleasant way of life, so yes if you try to force that on gay people that is hatred or bigotry.
Some people might choose that life but they will always be a small minority, sex is an important part of life and it cannot just be handwaved away. And there are rapists who find refraining from such activity unpleasant as well. Are you contending that if you try to force that on rapists that is hatred or bigotry?